Eco-tourism : Some questions
Share a piece by that finds a place in The Hindu - Sunday Magazine, 1st June 2014.
Thanks are due to The Hindu, Samrakshan Trust, Krithika, Ramki and Dharmendra.
How green is your travel?
Nimesh Ved and Yaranajit Deka
At a recent meeting in Kohima, Nagaland, a
senior wildlife biologist asked about the viability of eco-tourism as an income
source at multiple locations in places like Nagaland and Meghalaya? The demand
is, as of now, low due to remote locations and the way these states are
projected in the media. There were other questions too: How many tourists can
be expected in these not easily accessible areas? Can wildlife-based tourism
take off in places where dense vegetation does not help mammal sightings? At
that point, we were discussing Community Conserved Areas (CCA) in Nagaland and
exploring potential sources of income for the people who are the custodians of
the amazingly rich biodiversity in these areas.
A few weeks later, we found ourselves
reviewing an eco-tourism initiative: the Samrakshan Trust’s Community-Based
Conservation Initiative in Baghmara (Garo Hills, Meghalaya). Campsites have
been set up at Siju and Gongrot villages with focus on butterfly tourism. These
lie in the Baghmara Balpakram area that also houses the Siju Wildlife Sanctuary
(WLS), Baghmara Reserve Forest (RF) and the Balpakram National Park (NP). A
landscape with few equals in the area of biodiversity values, it is also an
Important Bird Area (IBA) and Elephant Reserve (ER).
A winter morning at Gongrot
As we delved deeper, a critical question
came up: whether an option like eco-tourism could be considered an ‘alternative
livelihood’? What were the chances of ‘eco-tourism’ being the ‘primary source
of livelihood’ for these families when coal mine labour was paying twice (and
more) the rates of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
(MNREGA)? Not to mention, of course, the range of cultivation practices from
jhum to orchards and wet rice cultivation to plantations.
We also recalled a similar situation faced
by an organisation working on similar lines in Arunachal Pradesh. The quandary
they faced was in competing with labour rates offered by construction of roads
and dams. Moreover, these ‘development / construction’ projects exist through
the year compared to tourism dictated by seasons. The more we thought about it
the more we wondered if eco-tourism was just one more option in the basket of
livelihood options! People could take a call on which of the multiple options
they want to take up; for what duration of the year and in what proportions.
We began to search for other perspectives
on livelihoods generated by eco-tourism in other bio-diversity rich parts of
India. Two recent, interesting and nuanced takes helped broaden our horizon.
M.D. Madhusudan and Pavithra Sankaran in their article ‘Eco-tourist, tread
carefully’ (Deccan Herald) talk about the increasing number of tourists in
Bandipur National Park (Karnataka) and state “ecotourism not only means
commercial but non-extractive use of forests, but also sharing of economic
benefits with local communities. To be equitable and successful, ecotourism
also has to offset the loss of livelihood for people who depend on extractive
use of the forest.”
In the other piece ‘Value Chain Mapping of
Tourism in Ladakh’, Kiran Rajashekariah and Pankaj Chandan wrote “eco-tourism
and community tourism have generated major interest amongst the key
decision-makers in Ladakh (Jammu and Kashmir). These concepts focus on the need
to ensure that tourism is not detrimental to the environmental and cultural
base on which it is dependent and does not ultimately, erode these resources.
However, an additional challenge is the integration of poor communities and
people within these sustainable models in order to direct tourism towards
poverty alleviation in a destination site.”
Siju camp on a winter morning
As we pondered on these, we recalled
conversations with friends that made us realise that each place could have its
advantages (and vice-versa) and it was not wise to paint the entire country
with the same brush. Ramki Sreenivasan, a well-known wildlife photographer,
talked of how difficult it was for one of the better-know bird-guides at
Kachchh (Gujarat), to get tourists (read business) beyond the season, which
lasts for just four to five months a year.
However, Dharmendra Khandal, a
conservation-biologist based at Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan), had a different
view. He talked of the direct involvement in tourism of approximately 6,000 -
7,000 individuals in the vicinity of Ranthambhore National Park for eight to 10
months a year. This, he added, would only increase since that Forest Department
was opening up more areas for tourism leading to an increase in the number of
tourists and tourism paraphernalia. This, in its turn, led to another question:
can tiger-tourism (or rather the way in which it manifests in India today) be
considered eco-tourism?
This led us back to certain uncomfortable
questions: Does it make sense to invest in eco-tourism without investing in
sustained communications on institution-building and ecological sensitivity?
Continued public support is the crux on which a programme of this nature is
built. During recent times there was a sad example in Assam when an eco-tourism
camp-site was burnt down by people, though operations have now been restarted.
The northeast also faces challenges of another kind. Most people tend to view
the eight states as one unit and, as a result, a bomb blast in, say Manipur,
leads to people cancelling their trip to Garo Hills in Meghalaya.
All these give rise to a number of
questions that can present food for thought for those associated with
eco-tourism. When a not-for-profit non-government organisation facilitates or
owns a wildlife tourism venture, does it begin with too much weight on its saddle?
How many in the not-for-profit sector possess the skills and aptitude to market
eco-tourism with the zeal it warrants? Do we pay due attention to ensure that
the venture generates enough revenue to make it financially independent? How
does one deal with a scenario where the facilitating organisation’s values
and/or other programmes are not in sync with what augurs well for eco-tourism?
In Samrakshan’s case, the organisation’s stand against hunting and mining in
Baghmara backfired by being seen as against the local people.
“Finally, are we expecting too much from
eco-tourism? Are we , like with Self Help Groups (SHG), albeit in a separate
context, assuming that they will be the solution in all places where wildlife
occurs”
A very relevant and incisive article on the livelihoods question. Whether it is eco-tourism or any other livelihood strategy what this reaffirms is the need to move away from a one-size-fits-all approach and use some of the questions raised in this article to develop criteria when considering a particular set of livelihood options.
ReplyDeleteRadha Gopalan
Very good piece Nimesh and Yaranajit. Also, the fact that you tried to cover both ends of question spectrum - what kind of eco-tourism initiatives should an organization in that space take up and to what extent; also the very definition of eco-tourism needs a revisit - is it beneficial to ecology or is it just related to ecology for the derivation of its names
ReplyDeleteMany thanks Aishwarya. Interesting - what you say. I recall a meeting where the question as to whether the primary goal of the intervention was to generate income or conserve biodiversity was put forth. Yes - where organizations comes from is pertinent.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks Radha for dropping by . . Also the point that we look only from our perspective and as a result fail to comprehend the complexities and layers . .
ReplyDelete